Philosophy 6 Final Exam Questions
The final will consist of 5 of the following questions.
You must answer 3 out of 5. Do not answer more than 3 questions (no extra
credit). Your answers should be argumentative essays. They should reflect
deep familiarity with assigned readings for each question. 1.
Compare and contrast Christian and Buddhist views of human
nature and the human condition. 2.
It is often argued that although the body clearly changes,
the soul remains the same, and thus sameness of soul is the basis of personal
identity and the hope of personal immortality.
What arguments support this view? What arguments oppose it? 3.
What arguments can be advanced in favor of the “memory
theory” of identity? What arguments are opposed? 4.
Explain: "Descartes' position on the mind-body
question is probably closest to that of the ordinary person, yet
philosophically the most naive." What are alternative explanations of
mind-body interaction? 5.
What is Plato’s conception of human nature? Why does Plato
say that the best society for humans is one organized along the lines of the Republic?
6.
According to Darwin, what are similarities and differences
between humans and animals? Explain why Darwin believed that morality did not
need a theological grounding. 7.
Marx sees history as exhibiting two simultaneous
movements: increased division of labor, and the concentration of ownership of
the means of production in the hands of fewer and fewer. What is the significance of these two
movements for alienation of workers? 8.
According to Braitenberg, behavior is the result of bodily
structures. Evaluate Braitenberg’s position on freedom. Compare Braitenberg’s
view of human nature with that of Aristotle. 9.
What is supposed to happen to men and women in Freudian
psychoanalysis? Critically analyze the Freudian story, paying particular
attention to Marxist and feminist critiques. Given what you know of Sartre, how
do you think existentialist psychoanalysis might differ from traditional
Freudian analysis? 10.
Compare and contrast the existentialism of Kierkegaard and
Sartre. 11.
Sartre became a Marxist later in his life. Is Marxism
compatible with Sartre’s views as expressed in Being and Nothingness? 12.
Explain and critically analyze why, according to Freud,
the different patterns and resolutions of the Oedipal phase in males and
females result in the moral inferiority of women. 13.
Compare and contrast Christian, Marxist, and
psychoanalytic views of marriage and the family. 14.
Is patriarchy inevitable? 15.
How are children oppressed, according to Firestone? 16.
Clearly explain how John Searle differentiates between
cognitivism and strong AI. Why does
Searle say cognitivism is incoherent? 17.
In “What is it Like to Be a Bat?” Nagel makes a radical
critique of physicalism. What is his
argument? NOTE: Nagel’s criticism is much more than
“Physicalism leaves something out”. WVC Philosophy Home Page | WVC Home Page Questions or comments? sandy_lafave@yahoo.com |